COURSE ASSESSMENTS
ASSIGNMENT 1
•10-15 page (2500 words) assignments
You are manager of the International Assessment Programme in the Ministry of Education, Trinidad and Tobago. Construct a Cabinet Note that provides justification for continuing and expanding the international assessment programme in Trinidad and Tobago.
Scaffolding
1.Consider use of international assessments elsewhere (Ravela et al. 2008)
2.Complete a cost-benefit analysis
3.Focus on a data generation and use system for evidence-based policy-making (Segone, 2009)
4.Consider choices in assessment frameworks
5.Consider the use and value of results, including comparative studies, evidence-based policymaking, and international benchmarking
SupportAdvice on writing Cabinet Notes
(Thanks Taliba)
Cost of national and international assessments compared-readings
- Smaller, Quicker, Cheaper -UNESCO 193 pages
- How much is learning worth?
- DIFD Advice
- The Kinds of Assessments that Latin America Needs-Ravela et al (2008)
ReferencesBest, M., Knight, P., Lietz, P., Lockwood, C., Nugroho, D., & Tobin, M. (2013). The impact of national and international assessment programmes on education policy, particularly policies regarding resource allocation and teaching and learning practices in developing countries. Australia: ACER Castejón, A., & Zancajo, A. (2015). Educational differentiation policies and the performance of disadvantaged students across OECD countries. European Educational Research Journal, 14(3-4), 222-239. De Lisle, J., Mohammed, R., & Lee-Piggott, R. (2014). Explaining Trinidad and Tobago's system response to international assessment data. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(4), 487-508.
De Lisle, J., Seecharan, H., & Ayodike, A. T. (2010, March). Is the Trinidad and Tobago education system structured to facilitate optimum human capital development? New findings on the relationship between education structures and outcomes from National and International Assessments. Paper presented on March 24-26, 2010 at the 11th Annual SALISES conference, Hyatt Hotel, Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago.
Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. L. (2010). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5-25.
- Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (2011). National, regional and international learning assessments: Trends among developing countries, 1960–2009. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 285-300.
- OECD (2011). PISA at a glance. Paris: OECD
Reddy, V., Zuze, T. L., Visser, M., Winnaar, L., Juan, A., & Prinsloo, C. H. Beyond Benchmarks. What twenty years of TIMSS data tells us about South African education. South Africa: HSRC. - Wagner, D. A. (2010). Quality of education, comparability, and assessment choice in developing countries. Compare, 40(6), 741-760.
Wagner, D. A., & Castillo, N. M. (2014). Learning at the bottom of the pyramid: Constraints, comparability and policy in developing countries. Prospects, 44(4), 627-638.
ASSIGNMENT 1 ALTERNATIVE 2018 (20 Marks)
•15-17 pages (2500 - 3000 words) written assignment and presentation (use outline)
You are Director of the Division of Educational Research & Evaluation (DERE).
WRITE AND PRESENT a benchmarking report on the progress being made by Trinidad and Tobago towards building a high performing and equitable school system. Use data from the 2006 and 2011 PIRLS and 2009 and 2015 PISA.
- Define and explain what is meant by a high performing and equitable school system
- Discuss performance indicators
- Identify metrics and data that may be used in valid comparisons
- Discuss the value and chalenges of comparisons
- Conduct benchmarking exercise with clear methodology
- Evaluate key findings & policy lessons
- Explore challenges of context in comparison
- Explore challenges of scale-up, implementation, and sustainability
- Write final conclusions
- Present written report orally
REMEMBER TO INCLUDE INFOGRAPHICS AND DATA VISUALIZATIONS.
Further Scaffolding
1. Describe the role of benchmarking in education systems
2. Identify possible data for benchmarking
3. Benchmark performances and practices using the data
4. Identify main findings and policy lessons
5. Comment on applicability of best practice
5. Comment on scaling and implementation issues
7. Identify implications for policy direction
Scoring and Criteria
Paper
- Effective and persuasive argument
- Insightful comparisons
- Accurate arguments
- Coherent and logical development of ideas and evidence
- Insightful use and presentations of evidence, including selected data visualizations


See IDB Policy Briefs on PISA for topics and data visualizations
Class Presentation and Discussion 12 marks
Paper (2500 words) 8 marks
- Effective and persuasive argument
- Effective presentation
- Coherent and logical argument in paper
- Useful data visualizations
Use this persuasion rubric for self assessment
See also for oral presentation persuasive speech rubric
ASSIGNMENT 2 (20 Marks for 2017-2019)
DEVELOP AN EVALUATION WORKPLAN FOR ANY SCHOOL, CURRICULUM, OR SYSTEM PROGRAMME RECENTLY IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO
•Scaffolding
–1. Describe the object of the evaluation
•– Extended description of school programme, including purpose, aims, objectives, initiation and implementation, and other relevant contextual factors (Chapter 12-Fitzpatrick, Sanders, & Worthen, 2010)
–2. Focus the evaluation
• – Develop Logic Model or Theory of Action AND Evaluation Questions. You MAY include Goals, Criteria, Indicators, Targets, OR Standards (Provide Rationale for each)
l(Chapter 13-Fitzpatrick, Sanders, & Worthen, 2010)
–3. Suggest & describe an appropriate evaluation design/model.
•Recommend AN APPROACH/MODEL AND An evaluation DESIGN
•In the Design, describe the Sample/Sampling strategy, Data Collection Approaches, Instruments, and Data Analysis. (Provide Rationale for Choices) (Chapter 4-10 & 15-16-Fitzpatrick, Sanders, & Worthen, 2010)
–4. Identify the likely audience and content of the report.
•Include proposals for better use of data, including visualizations (Chapter 17-Fitzpatrick, Sanders, & Worthen, 2010)
•Comment briefly on the politics of evaluation
Support
Details on Change theory
Get Rubrics here
EDME 6121 Assignment Rubrics